Be Rwanda WiseDoing Business in Rwanda

Chapter 7 · Section 7.5 of 8

Technology transfer, franchising and licensing: recording patent and trade mark licences with RDB as a condition of validity, the anti-competitive clauses listed in Articles 47 and 212 of Law N° 055/2024, vertical restraints under Law N° 011/2026, trade secrets and know-how, and the 15% withholding tax, 2% deduction cap and VAT on royalties

Reviewed · Prepared by a commercial lawyer with over 30 years' international experience · Legal and tax information, not legal advice · How we check · Open in the app

Download chapter 7 as a PDF

What you need to know

No technology transfer or franchise statute: where the rules come from

Rwanda has no statute dedicated to technology transfer agreements and no franchise law: there is no franchise registration, no mandatory pre-contract disclosure document and no government approval of royalty rates. The United States Department of State's 2026 Investment Climate Statement records that the Government does not impose conditions on the transfer of technology. The rules that do apply are spread across five instruments, and a licensor that ignores any one of them can find its licence unenforceable, its clauses void or its royalties taxed twice.

The first is Law N° 055/2024 of 20/06/2024 on the protection of intellectual property (the IP Law), in force since 31 July 2024, which makes the recordal of patent and mark assignments and licences a condition of their validity, lists clauses that are treated as anti-competitive, and protects secret information. The second is Law N° 011/2026 of 26/02/2026 relating to competition and consumer protection, in force since 4 March 2026, which regulates vertical agreements and the use of intellectual property rights to exclude competitors. The third is Law N° 45/2011 of 25/11/2011 governing contracts, the general law on formation, interpretation and remedies described in Commercial contracts in Rwanda. The fourth is the income tax and VAT legislation, which taxes royalties at source and limits their deduction. The fifth is the investment and foreign exchange framework, which governs payment of royalties abroad. Registration of the underlying rights is covered in The IP law and trade marks and Patents, utility models and industrial designs.

Recording licences and assignments: validity depends on it

The IP Law adopts a strict rule. A patent or a pending patent application may be assigned by a written contract signed by both parties, and the assignment "becomes valid and enforceable if it is recorded in the register of patents" (Article 42(1) and (4)). A patent owner may grant an exclusive, semi-exclusive or non-exclusive licence by a written contract signed by both parties, and "the patent licence becomes valid and enforceable if it is recorded in the register of patents" (Article 44(1) and (3)). The same rules apply to registered marks: an assignment is valid and enforceable once recorded in the register of marks (Article 207(3)), and so is a mark licence (Article 209(3)). An unrecorded licence is therefore not merely unopposable to third parties, as in many systems; on the wording of the Law it is not valid and enforceable at all, which puts at risk the licensee's right to use the mark and the licensor's ability to sue on the contract in Rwanda.

The filing duty falls on the party acquiring the right. Upon payment of the prescribed fee, the assignee submits the signed assignment contract to the competent authority, which records the change of ownership and publishes the details (Articles 42(3) and 207(2)); the licensee submits a copy of the licence contract, and RDB records the subject matter of a patent licence, or the fact of a mark licence, and keeps the contract itself confidential (Articles 44(2) and 209(2)). In practice the filing is made to the Intellectual Property Division of RDB's Office of the Registrar General, and a party resident or established outside Rwanda acts through an industrial property agent authorised by RDB (Article 251(2)). A recorded licence is withdrawn from the register when the contract is terminated by either party or the patent or mark is invalidated (Articles 45 and 210), so the parties should notify RDB when a licence ends, or the register will continue to show a licensee that no longer has rights.

RDB applies the fees in its published tariff, which derives from Ministerial Order N° 24 of 17/03/2016. Article 384 of the IP Law kept the earlier fee orders in force for only six months from its publication, to about 31 January 2025, and no successor order had been located at 10 October 2026, so the amounts below are RDB's published tariff rather than a current Ministerial Order. Copyright and software licences are not recorded (Copyright, software and digital content).

What must be recorded with RDB, by whom and at what cost (10 October 2026)

TransactionWho filesLegal effect of recordalRDB published fee
Assignment of a patent or patent applicationAssignee, with the contract signed by both partiesValid and enforceable only once recorded; change published (Article 42)RWF 40,000
Contractual licence of a patent (exclusive, semi-exclusive or non-exclusive)Licensee, with a copy of the licenceValid and enforceable only once recorded; contract kept confidential (Article 44)RWF 20,000
Assignment of a registered markAssignee, with the signed contractValid and enforceable once recorded; refused if it would mislead the public (Articles 207 and 208)RWF 50,000
Contractual licence of a registered markLicensee, with a copy of the licenceValid and enforceable once recorded; contract kept confidential (Article 209)RWF 50,000
Patent licence of rightPatent owner, by written request after grantAny person may obtain a licence on approved terms; annual maintenance fee halved (Article 48)Per RDB tariff
Compulsory licence of a patentApplicant, to the Minister, after a refused request for a voluntary licenceLicence granted on statutory grounds (Articles 50 and 51)RWF 100,000 request fee
Copyright and software licenceNo recordalValid between the parties on its terms; assignments must be in writing (Article 320)None

The competition screen: clauses RDB will not record

Recordal is not a formality. RDB does not record a patent assignment if a clause, or the contract as a whole, has the intention or likely effect of lessening competition, restraining trade, abusing a position of market power conferred by the patent or unduly limiting the dissemination of technology (Article 43(1)), and it does not record a patent licence that has an anti-competitive effect (Article 46(1)). Before deciding it may hear the parties and seek the advice of the organ in charge of competition regulation, which since March 2026 is the authority applying Law N° 011/2026, the Rwanda Inspectorate, Competition and Consumer Protection Authority (RICA). A refusal may be appealed to the Appeal Committee within 30 days of notification (Articles 43(3) and 46(3)). A restriction on the licensee or assignee that is neither required by the IP Law nor reasonably necessary to safeguard the patent is considered anti-competitive (Articles 43(4) and 46(4)).

Article 47 then lists eight patent licence clauses that are considered to have an anti-competitive effect, and an Order of the Minister may add others. For marks, RDB refuses to record a licence that contains clauses constituting unfair competition, or where the licensing is likely to mislead consumers as to geographical origin, quality, nature, characteristics, manufacturing process or suitability for use (Article 211(1)); a restriction not reasonably necessary to safeguard the registered mark has the effect of unfair competition (Article 211(4)); and Article 212 lists seven clauses that create a rebuttable presumption of unfair competition. The difference matters: a patent licence clause on the Article 47 list is treated as anti-competitive, while a mark licence clause on the Article 212 list can be defended with evidence, typically that it protects the quality the mark signifies, which Article 211 itself treats as a legitimate concern.

Clauses treated as anti-competitive in patent and mark licences

ClausePatent licence (Article 47)Mark licence (Article 212)
Exclusive grant-back of improvements to the licensorListedNot listed
Licensee may not oppose or seek revocation or invalidation of the right (no-challenge)ListedListed
Licence conditional on taking a licence of another industrial property right (tying)ListedListed
Unreasonable fees for a patent or mark not yet usedListedListed
Obligation to buy raw materials, intermediate products or equipment from the licensorListedListed
Export ban, or export only on payment of an unreasonable feeListedListed
Any limit on the licensee's opportunities to use the patent, or sell goods bearing the mark, on internal or external marketsListedListed
Supplementary obligation with no connection to the subject matter of the contractListedListed
EffectConsidered anti-competitive; recordal refused (Article 46); Minister may add clauses by OrderRebuttable presumption of unfair competition; recordal may be refused (Article 211)

Franchising: building the agreement from Rwandan law

A franchise in Rwanda is a bundle of rights granted under general law: a licence of the franchisor's registered marks, which must be recorded with RDB to be valid; a licence of copyright in the operations manual, recipes, software and designs, which needs no recordal but should be in writing; and a licence of know-how and secret information, protected by contract and by Article 276 of the IP Law. The contract itself is governed by Law N° 45/2011 of 25/11/2011 governing contracts, and the parties may choose a foreign governing law and arbitration, subject to mandatory Rwandan rules on competition, consumers, tax, currency and employment (Arbitration law and KIAC). The first step is therefore always to register the marks in Rwanda, nationally through RDB or by designating Rwanda under the Madrid Protocol, because only a registered mark can be licensed under Article 209.

Three common franchise clauses need care. Territorial and channel restrictions: a clause that limits in any way the licensee's opportunities to sell goods bearing the mark on internal or external markets is presumed to be unfair competition under Article 212(f), and Article 5 of Law N° 011/2026 separately prohibits vertical agreements that have as their object the prevention of effective use of the internet to buy or sell, so an outright ban on online sales by a franchisee is not available. Approved suppliers: an obligation to buy inputs or equipment from the franchisor is presumed unfair under Article 212(d); a quality specification that any supplier meeting the standard may satisfy is easier to defend than a purchasing tie. Pricing: Article 5 prohibits minimum resale price maintenance, while recommended prices are allowed if marked as recommended, and a franchisor may not fix the franchisee's minimum retail prices.

Where a restriction is commercially necessary, Article 6 of Law N° 011/2026 allows the competition authority to authorise an otherwise prohibited agreement on efficiency grounds, for a limited period (Article 7). Fines for prohibited agreements reach 5% of the preceding year's annual turnover (Article 66). A franchisee selling to consumers also carries the consumer duties of Law N° 011/2026, and, if it sells online, the e-commerce licence and disclosure rules described in E-commerce, fintech and AI.

Trade secrets, know-how and software

Know-how is often the most valuable part of a technology transfer, and Rwanda protects it as secret information under the unfair competition chapter of the IP Law. Information is secret if it is unknown or not easily accessible, has commercial value because it is secret, and its holder has taken reasonable steps to keep it secret (Article 276(3)). Disclosure, acquisition or use without the holder's consent in a manner contrary to honest commercial practices is unfair competition, and Article 276(2) gives examples: industrial or commercial espionage, breach of contract, breach of confidence, inducing any of these, and acquisition by a third party who knew of the wrongdoing. Unauthorised use of a competitor's patented invention, design, mark, technical formula or manufacturing method is also unfair competition (Article 275), and the holder may sue in the competent court for cessation and damages (Article 277). Theft of a formula of invention is an offence punishable by three to five years' imprisonment and a fine of RWF 7,000,000 to RWF 10,000,000 (Article 379), and enforcement is described in IP enforcement and anti-counterfeiting.

Protection depends on the "reasonable steps" test, so a licensor should require written confidentiality undertakings from the licensee and its key staff, mark documents as confidential, restrict access and keep records of disclosure. Software is protected by copyright as a literary work (Article 279), and "computer programs per se, software and their related databases" are excluded from patent protection, although computer-implemented processes and products remain patentable and an applicant for such a patent waives copyright protection for the same subject matter (Article 23). A software licence or assignment is a copyright transaction: an assignment must be in writing and state the rights, duration, territory and remuneration, and rights not listed stay with the author (Article 320).

Licences of right and compulsory licences

A patent owner may ask RDB at any time after grant to record that a licence of right is available, after which any person may use the invention on terms agreed with the owner and approved by RDB, and the annual maintenance fee is halved (Article 48); the offer can be withdrawn if no licence has been granted or all licensees consent (Article 49). The reverse risk is a compulsory licence: a person refused a voluntary licence on reasonable terms may apply to the Minister in charge of intellectual property (Article 50) on grounds that include failure to work the invention in Rwanda or insufficient working in quantity, quality or price, anti-competitive use and dependent patents (Article 51), and the Minister may act on the Minister's own initiative for national security, public health or the environment (Article 57). A foreign patent owner that supplies Rwanda only by import should document why the market is adequately served.

Tax on royalties and paying them abroad

Article 41 of Law N° 027/2022 of 20/10/2022 establishing taxes on income (the Income Tax Law) defines royalty income broadly: payments for the use of, or right to use, copyright in literary, artistic or scientific works including films; trade marks, trade names, designs, models, computer applications, software and patents; industrial, commercial or scientific equipment; and information concerning industrial, commercial or scientific knowledge, which covers know-how. Royalties paid by a Rwandan resident bear 15% withholding tax under Article 60, declared and paid within 15 days after the month of payment, and the payer is personally liable if it fails to withhold (Articles 64 and 66). The treaty texts published by the Rwanda Revenue Authority (RRA) cap royalties at 10% for China, Mauritius, Singapore, South Africa and the United Arab Emirates, against a tax residence certificate submitted with the declaration (Withholding taxes and tax treaties; FAQ 23).

Two limits apply to deductions and VAT. Under Article 25(9) of the Income Tax Law, management, technical service and royalty fees paid to a related non-resident are not deductible to the extent that, in aggregate, they exceed 2% of the payer's turnover, and related-party royalties must also be priced at arm's length under Ministerial Order N° 003/26/10/TC of 29/04/2026 (Transfer pricing and international tax). The cap does not apply to royalties paid to an unrelated franchisor or licensor. For VAT, a licence is an intangible activity performed for payment, so royalties paid to a foreign licensor are an imported service on which the Rwandan business self-accounts for 18% VAT under the reverse charge in Article 14 of Law N° 049/2023 of 05/09/2023 establishing value added tax, recoverable only where the Minister has authorised the deduction for a service not available in Rwanda under Ministerial Order N° 003/24/03/TC of 08/03/2024.

Rwanda also offers an incentive for holding intellectual property in Rwanda. Point II of the Annex to Law N° 006/2021 of 05/02/2021 on Investment Promotion and Facilitation grants a 3% corporate income tax rate on foreign-sourced royalties to a registered investor operating as an intellectual property company that spends at least USD 10,000 a year in Rwanda, has a physical office and a bank account in Rwanda, has Rwandan residents as at least 30% or three of its staff, whichever is higher, and as at least one or 25% of its directors, holds its strategic board meetings in Rwanda and has two qualified Rwandan resident board members (point II(5)), and point X sets withholding tax at 0% on dividends, interest and royalties paid by investors on the 15% and 3% regimes it lists (Kigali International Financial Centre). The investor must hold an RDB investment certificate; the rate is not available to an unregistered company. Payment of royalties abroad is a current transaction that banks process against documents, and Article 12 of the Investment Code separately allows an investor, once its tax obligations in Rwanda are met, to repatriate capital, profits, loan repayments, liquidation proceeds and other assets; the paying bank will ask for the contract, invoice and evidence of withholding tax (Repatriating profits and capital).

Putting a cross-border licence or franchise in place, step by step

  1. Register the rights in RwandaFile the marks with RDB or designate Rwanda under the Madrid Protocol, and file any patents nationally, under the PCT or through ARIPO; only registered marks and granted patents can be licensed under Articles 44 and 209.
  2. Screen the draft against Articles 47 and 212Remove grant-backs, no-challenge, tying and export clauses; recast territorial, supply and pricing terms so that they are justified by quality control and comply with Article 5 of Law N° 011/2026.
  3. Sign in writingBoth parties sign the licence or assignment; Articles 42, 44, 207 and 209 require a written contract signed by both parties, and Article 320 requires writing for copyright assignments.
  4. Record with RDBThe licensee or assignee files the contract with the Intellectual Property Division of RDB's Office of the Registrar General, with the fee in RDB's tariff and, for a non-resident filer, through an authorised agent; keep the recordal certificate.
  5. Answer any objection within the time allowedIf RDB proposes to refuse recordal, make submissions; a refusal can be appealed to the Appeal Committee within 30 days of notification (Articles 43, 46 and 211).
  6. Set up the tax and payment fileObtain the licensor's tax residence certificate, withhold 15% or the treaty rate, declare within 15 days after the month, self-account for reverse-charge VAT and keep transfer pricing support for related-party royalties.
  7. Protect the know-howPut confidentiality undertakings in place with the licensee and its staff, limit access and mark documents, so that the information meets the reasonable steps test in Article 276.
  8. Notify changes and terminationRecord amendments and assignments, and notify RDB when the licence ends so that it is withdrawn from the register under Articles 45 and 210.

Decision guide

Will this licence be valid and recordable in Rwanda?

A decision guide for a licensor or licensee reviewing a draft patent, trade mark or franchise agreement. Answer in order.

  1. Is the right a registered mark, or a patent or pending patent application, in Rwanda?
    YesContinue to Q2.
    NoRegister it first; a licence of an unregistered mark relies only on contract and unfair competition law, and copyright and know-how licences need no recordal.
  2. Is the agreement in writing and signed by both parties?
    YesContinue to Q3.
    NoIt cannot be recorded; under Articles 44 and 209 an unrecorded licence is not valid and enforceable.
  3. Does it contain a clause on the Article 47 list (patents) or the Article 212 list (marks), or a restriction not reasonably necessary to safeguard the right?
    YesRemove or justify it. For a patent, expect refusal under Article 46; for a mark, be ready to rebut the presumption, for example by showing that the clause protects product quality.
    NoContinue to Q4.
  4. Does it fix minimum resale prices or prevent effective use of the internet to sell?
    YesRemove the clause, or apply to the competition authority for authorisation under Article 6 of Law N° 011/2026; fines reach 5% of turnover.
    NoFile for recordal with RDB, pay the tariff fee and set up withholding tax on the royalties.

Worked example

A foreign restaurant brand franchised to a Rwandan company

An unrelated franchisor resident in the United Arab Emirates grants a Rwandan company a ten-year franchise for a restaurant brand, with two registered marks, an operations manual and recipes. The franchisee's annual gross sales are RWF 1,200,000,000 and the royalty is 6% of gross sales. The franchisor supplies a current UAE tax residence certificate. Figures are illustrative.

Recordal of the mark licencesTwo mark licences at RWF 50,000 each in RDB's tariff = RWF 100,000, filed by the franchisee before the first royalty is paid, so that the licence is valid and enforceable under Article 209(3).
Annual royalty6% x RWF 1,200,000,000 = RWF 72,000,000.
Withholding taxDomestic rate 15% = RWF 10,800,000; treaty rate 10% = RWF 7,200,000, declared with the residence certificate within 15 days after the month of payment.
Net paid to the franchisorRWF 72,000,000 - RWF 7,200,000 = RWF 64,800,000, transferred through the franchisee's bank against the contract, invoice and withholding tax receipt.
Reverse-charge VAT18% x RWF 72,000,000 = RWF 12,960,000 self-accounted by the franchisee; a cost unless the Minister has authorised deduction.
Deduction for the franchiseeThe full RWF 72,000,000 is deductible because the franchisor is unrelated; if it were a related company, related-party royalties and fees above 2% of turnover (RWF 24,000,000) would be disallowed.
Clauses changed after reviewA ban on delivery-platform sales and a mandatory purchase of all ingredients from the franchisor were replaced by brand standards for online ordering and an approved-supplier specification open to any supplier meeting it.

The franchisee bears the cost of a missed withholding personally under Article 66 of the Income Tax Law.

The franchise agreement can be governed by a foreign law with KIAC arbitration, but recordal, withholding tax and the competition rules apply regardless.

Questions investors ask

Must a trade mark or patent licence be registered in Rwanda?

Yes. Under Articles 44(3) and 209(3) of Law N° 055/2024 a patent or mark licence becomes valid and enforceable only when recorded in RDB's register, and assignments likewise under Articles 42(4) and 207(3). The licensee files a copy of the contract with the fee in RDB's tariff, RWF 20,000 for a patent licence or RWF 50,000 for a mark licence, and RDB keeps the contract confidential.

Does Rwanda have a franchise law?

No. There is no franchise statute, registration or disclosure document. A franchise combines a recorded trade mark licence under Law N° 055/2024, copyright and know-how licences, Law N° 45/2011 governing contracts and the vertical agreement rules in Article 5 of Law N° 011/2026, which prohibit minimum resale prices and bans on effective use of the internet to sell.

Which licence clauses are prohibited in Rwanda?

Article 47 of Law N° 055/2024 treats eight patent licence clauses as anti-competitive, including exclusive grant-backs, no-challenge clauses, tying, fees for unused patents, compulsory purchases from the licensor, export bans and market limits. Article 212 makes similar trade mark licence clauses a rebuttable presumption of unfair competition, and RDB may refuse to record either kind of licence.

What withholding tax applies to royalties paid from Rwanda?

15% under Article 60 of Law N° 027/2022 on royalties, which Article 41 defines to include payments for trade marks, software, patents, designs and know-how. The rate falls to 10% under the treaties with China, Mauritius, Singapore, South Africa and the UAE, against a tax residence certificate, and to 0% where the payer is on an Investment Code 3% regime.

Are royalties paid to a foreign parent fully deductible?

Not always. Article 25 of Law N° 027/2022 disallows management, technical and royalty fees paid to related non-residents to the extent that, in aggregate, they exceed 2% of the payer's turnover, and the royalty must be at arm's length under the transfer pricing rules. Royalties paid to an unrelated licensor are not subject to the 2% cap.

How are trade secrets protected in Rwanda?

Article 276 of Law N° 055/2024 treats disclosure, acquisition or use of secret information contrary to honest commercial practices as unfair competition, if the information is secret, has commercial value because it is secret and is protected by reasonable steps. The holder can sue under Article 277, and theft of a formula of invention is a criminal offence under Article 379.

Terms you will meet in the documents

EnglishKinyarwandaFrenchMeaning
Contractual licence (patent)—Licence contractuelle du brevetA written licence of a patent, exclusive, semi-exclusive or non-exclusive, valid only when recorded (Article 44).
Assignment (patent)—Cession de brevetTransfer of ownership of a patent or application by written contract, valid only when recorded (Article 42).
MarkIkirangoMarqueA sign distinguishing goods or services; its licences and assignments are recorded under Articles 207 and 209.
Licence of right—Licence de plein droitA recorded offer by a patent owner to license any person on approved terms, halving the annual fee (Article 48).
Compulsory licence—Licence obligatoireA licence granted by the Minister without the owner's consent, for example for non-working in Rwanda (Articles 50 to 57).
Secret informationAmakuru y'ibangaInformation confidentielleInformation that is secret, valuable because secret and protected by reasonable steps (Article 276).
Technical know-how—Savoir-faire techniqueTechnical formulas and manufacturing methods whose unauthorised use is unfair competition (Article 275).
Unfair competition—Concurrence déloyaleActs contrary to honest commercial practices; mark licence clauses in Article 212 are presumed to be unfair competition.
RoyaltiesIbihembo by'uruhushyaRedevancesPayments for the use of IP and know-how (Article 41, Law N° 027/2022), subject to 15% withholding tax.
Next in this chapter · 7.6Personal data protectionWhat Rwanda's data protection law requires of local companies and foreign businesses serving people in Rwanda: registration with the NCSA, a representative and a data protection officer, lawful processing, rights, breach deadlines, cross-border transfers, the storage rule and the sanctions.Continue →

Related in this guide

Related investor FAQs

Official sources

Have a question about your own situation?

Ask Be Rwanda Wise's Rwandabot, the AI legal-information chatbot. It checks official Rwandan sources and points you to the governing law, or read how to find and check a Rwandan advocate.

Ask Rwandabot about thisOpen in the appFind a lawyer

This page gives legal and tax information, not legal advice. Rates, thresholds and procedures change; the content is reviewed against official sources, but you should confirm anything important with the relevant authority or an advocate registered with the Rwanda Bar Association before you act. Laws are published in Kinyarwanda, English and French in the Official Gazette; check the official text before relying on a translation.