Chapter 10 · Section 10.8 of 8
Sanctions, due diligence and reforms: the EU listings of 17 March 2025, the US Treasury designations of 2 March and 25 June 2026 including the Gasabo Gold Refinery, who they bind and the 50 percent rule, what buyers, refiners, lenders and investors must do, Rwanda's own anti-money-laundering duties for mineral dealers, EU and US conflict-minerals rules, the 2024-26 reforms and the 2027 horizon
What you need to know
- By Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2025/510 of 17 March 2025, implementing Decision 2010/788/CFSP on restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Council of the European Union listed nine individuals and one entity, among them Gasabo Gold Refinery in Kigali and Francis Kamanzi, described in the Council's announcement as chief executive of the Rwanda Mines, Petroleum and Gas Board, subjecting them to an asset freeze, a travel ban and a prohibition on making funds available to them.
- On 25 June 2026 the United States Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated Gasabo Gold Refinery LTD under Executive Order 13413, as amended, together with its chairman, its general manager and three Rwandan mining companies, Bugambira Mines LTD, Wolfram Mining and Processing LTD and Rwinkwavu Mining Corporation LTD, and no general licence accompanied that action.
- On 2 March 2026 OFAC designated the Rwanda Defence Force and four of its senior officers under Executive Order 13413, as amended, and issued DRC-related General License 1 authorising the wind down of transactions involving the Rwanda Defence Force until 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time on 1 April 2026.
- Under OFAC's rules all property and interests in property of designated persons within United States jurisdiction are blocked and must be reported, entities owned 50 percent or more, directly or indirectly, individually or in aggregate, by blocked persons are themselves blocked, and civil penalties apply on a strict liability basis.
- EU and US sanctions are not Rwandan law: Rwanda's own targeted financial sanctions regime under Article 67 of Law N° 001/2025 of 22/01/2025 concerns terrorist financing and proliferation financing, while dealers in precious metals and stones are reporting persons under Article 8 of that Law and must apply customer due diligence to cash transactions of RWF 15,000,000 or more under Regulations N° 002/FIC/2026 of 22/06/2026.
- Regulation (EU) 2017/821 has required EU importers of tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold to carry out OECD-based supply chain due diligence since 1 January 2021 and is the subject of a review for which the European Commission issued a prior information notice on 11 May 2026 and a call for tenders on 16 June 2026, and United States issuers using those minerals from the Democratic Republic of the Congo or an adjoining country, including Rwanda, must file Form SD each year under section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
Why sanctions sit at the centre of mineral due diligence
Between March 2025 and June 2026 the European Union and the United States adopted three sets of measures that reach Rwanda's mineral sector: the European Union listings of 17 March 2025, the United States designations of the Rwanda Defence Force on 2 March 2026, and the United States designations of a Kigali gold refinery and three mining companies on 25 June 2026. This section describes them as the sanctioning authorities' own announcements and legal acts state them. They are measures of foreign governments under their own law; they are not findings of a Rwandan court, they do not change Rwandan law, and each regime provides a procedure by which a listed person may seek removal.
Their practical reach is nonetheless wide. Rwanda's mineral exports are priced and paid largely in United States dollars, sold to refiners and traders in Europe, Asia and North America, and financed by banks with international correspondent relationships. A buyer, smelter, lender, insurer or acquirer connected with the European Union or the United States must be able to show that no listed person, and no entity owned by one, is in its supply chain or its counterparty structure. Sanctions screening has therefore joined licence checks and traceability documents, explained in 3T, gold and traceability, as a standard part of any Rwandan mineral transaction.
The European Union listings of 17 March 2025
On 17 March 2025 the Council of the European Union adopted Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2025/510, implementing Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). According to the Council's announcement of that date, it listed nine individuals and one entity in response to the escalation of the conflict in eastern DRC. Two of the listings concern Rwanda's mineral sector. The entity is Gasabo Gold Refinery, based in Kigali, which the Council's announcement states imported gold from regions of the DRC controlled by the M23 armed group. One of the individuals is Francis Kamanzi, described in the announcement as chief executive of the Rwanda Mines, Petroleum and Gas Board (RMB), whom the Council lists in connection with the exploitation of and trade in natural resources. RMB has had a new chief executive since July 2025, as reported in the Rwandan press. The other listings concern leaders of M23 and three officers of the Rwanda Defence Force.
The measures are an asset freeze, a travel ban into or through the European Union, and a prohibition on European Union citizens and companies making funds or economic resources available to the listed persons. The Council stated that its autonomous measures for the DRC then applied to 32 individuals and 2 entities, alongside 53 listings by the United Nations. European Union sanctions bind persons within the territory of the Union, nationals of Member States wherever they are, companies incorporated in the Union, and any business done in whole or in part within the Union. A listed person may ask the Council to reconsider its listing and may challenge it before the General Court of the European Union.
The United States designations of 2 March and 25 June 2026
On 2 March 2026 the United States Department of the Treasury announced (press release sb0411) that OFAC had designated the Rwanda Defence Force under Executive Order 13413, as amended by Executive Order 13671, citing actions it said threatened the peace, security or stability of the DRC and material assistance to M23, and had designated four senior officers as leaders of the Rwanda Defence Force. On the same day OFAC published DRC-related General License 1, 'Authorizing the Wind Down of Transactions Involving the Rwanda Defence Force'; the licence text authorised wind-down transactions only until 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time on 1 April 2026, and required any payment to a blocked person to be made into a blocked account. Because of the 50 percent rule, any entity owned 50 percent or more by the Rwanda Defence Force, alone or with other blocked persons, is also blocked, whether or not it is named.
On 25 June 2026 the Treasury announced (press release sb0543) the designation under Executive Order 13413, as amended, of Gasabo Gold Refinery LTD. According to the announcement, it was designated under two criteria of that Order: having materially assisted, sponsored or provided support for M23, and involvement in the illicit trade in natural resources of the DRC. OFAC designated at the same time the refinery's chairman, listed as Jean Malic Kalima Karekezi, and its general manager, Bosco Kayobotsi, as owned or controlled by, or acting for, the refinery; and three companies it describes as controlled by the chairman: Bugambira Mines LTD (also known as Multiserve Consults Ltd), Wolfram Mining and Processing LTD and Rwinkwavu Mining Corporation LTD, as owned or controlled by, or acting for, him. OFAC's list of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN List) records Kigali and Rwinkwavu addresses, company websites and, for the refinery, its Rwandan company number, which compliance teams should use for matching. OFAC's notice of that day lists no general licence for these designations.
The consequences stated in the Treasury's announcements are the same for both actions. All property and interests in property of the designated persons that are in the United States or in the possession or control of United States persons are blocked and must be reported to OFAC. Entities owned 50 percent or more, directly or indirectly, individually or in the aggregate, by one or more blocked persons are also blocked. Unless authorised by an OFAC general or specific licence or exempt, United States persons and transactions within or transiting the United States may not deal in blocked property, including by providing or receiving funds, goods or services. Civil penalties may be imposed on a strict liability basis, non-United States persons may not cause United States persons to violate the rules or engage in evasion, and the 25 June 2026 announcement states that 'financial institutions and other persons may risk exposure to sanctions for engaging in certain transactions' with designated persons. Delisting is available through OFAC's petition procedure.
Who is bound, and where Rwandan law stands
The European Union and United States measures bind those within the jurisdiction of the sanctioning authority. A Rwandan company with no European or United States owners, staff, assets, bank accounts or payment flows is not itself subject to them as a matter of law. In practice few mineral businesses are in that position: payments in United States dollars normally clear through United States correspondent banks, buyers and refiners are often European or American or supply customers that are, and international lenders and insurers apply both regimes as a condition of their facilities. Rwandan banks with correspondent relationships typically screen against these lists under their own risk policies.
Rwanda's own sanctions law is narrower. Article 67 of Law N° 001/2025 of 22/01/2025 on the prevention and punishment of money laundering, terrorist financing and the financing of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction concerns targeted financial sanctions related to terrorist financing and proliferation financing, with the role of the National Counter-terrorism Committee set by Prime Minister's Order, and Regulations N° 001/FIC/2025 of 15/01/2025 relating to targeted financial sanctions require reporting persons to freeze 'without delay but no later than 24 hours'. Those rules apply to the designations made under that regime; they do not, by themselves, give effect in Rwanda to European Union or United States listings. The full anti-money-laundering framework is explained in Anti-money-laundering and sanctions compliance.
Rwanda's own rules for mineral dealers and exporters
Rwandan law imposes its own controls on the mineral trade, independent of foreign sanctions. Under Article 8 of Law N° 001/2025, dealers in precious metals and precious stones are reporting persons, alongside banks, lawyers, accountants and others. Under Regulations N° 002/FIC/2026 of 22/06/2026 of the Financial Intelligence Centre (FIC), they must apply customer due diligence to occasional cash transactions of RWF 15,000,000 or more, linked transactions being added together, and report cash transactions at that level to the FIC within two working days; suspicious transactions of any amount, including attempted ones, must be reported within 24 hours, and tipping off is prohibited. A legal person that breaches its preventive duties faces a fine of RWF 5,000,000 to RWF 20,000,000 under Article 66 of the Law, and administrative fines under Regulations N° 001/FIC/2026. Beneficial owners holding 25% or more of shares or voting rights must be identified.
The Mining Law adds provenance offences. Under Law N° 072/2024 of 26/06/2024 on mining and quarry operations, a person found with minerals without proof of origin pays an administrative fine of 10% of their value and the minerals are confiscated for auction (Article 50); possessing illegally extracted minerals is punished by 1 to 3 years' imprisonment (Article 64); and trading in them by more than 5 and up to 10 years and a fine of RWF 60,000,000 to RWF 120,000,000, or RWF 130,000,000 to RWF 150,000,000 for a company, which may be dissolved (Article 65). Export certificates, including the certificate of the International Conference on the Great Lakes Region (ICGLR), are issued through RMB's online Mineral Certification Information System (MCIS). Mineral traders are among the persons deemed authorised to transact in foreign currency under the National Bank of Rwanda (BNR) Directive N° 4230/2025-00042 of 17/09/2025, and anyone crossing the border with RWF 10,000,000 or more in cash or bearer instruments must declare it.
What buyers, refiners and investors must do
The reference standard is the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas. Rwanda states that it adheres to it, the Regional Economic Integration Framework signed with the DRC on 4 December 2025 commits both States to it, and RMB's model agreements require compliance with traceability and certification mechanisms. Its five steps are: establish strong company management systems; identify and assess risks in the supply chain; design and implement a strategy to respond to identified risks; carry out an independent third-party audit of the due diligence of smelters and refiners; and report publicly each year on supply chain due diligence.
Sanctions screening is the layer on top. Every counterparty in the chain, from licence holder and trader to exporter, refiner and logistics provider, should be screened against the European Union consolidated list and the OFAC SDN List, together with its directors, shareholders and beneficial owners, and the ownership of each entity should be traced far enough to apply the 50 percent rule, which aggregates holdings of different blocked persons. Screening should be repeated at each shipment, because designations change. Transaction documents should check the RMB licence, the ICGLR or Mineral Export Certificate, the traceability tags and logbook entries, and the payment route. Industry schemes help but do not replace this work: the Responsible Minerals Initiative suspended its recognition process for the ITSCI traceability programme in July 2024, as reported in the trade press, while the European Commission recognised the Responsible Minerals Assurance Process for Regulation (EU) 2017/821 on 16 October 2025.
EU and United States conflict-minerals reporting
Regulation (EU) 2017/821 has applied since 1 January 2021 to importers into the European Union of tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold, their ores and metals, above set annual volumes. They must carry out supply chain due diligence in line with the OECD Guidance, obtain third-party audits and report. The European Commission published a prior information notice on 11 May 2026 and a call for tenders on 16 June 2026 for a review of the Regulation.
In the United States, section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Act, codified at 15 U.S.C. §78m(p), requires issuers reporting to the Securities and Exchange Commission that use tin, tantalum, tungsten or gold originating in the DRC or an 'adjoining country', a term that includes Rwanda, to disclose it. The Commission's staff have applied no-action relief to parts of the rule since April 2017, but Form SD remains due by 31 May each year (on 1 June in 2026, because 31 May fell on a Sunday). The disclosure duty falls on the listed buyer, not on the Rwandan exporter, but buyers will ask exporters for the traceability and due diligence information they need (FAQ 109).
Investors, acquirers and lenders
Acquiring a Rwandan mining company or licence calls for sanctions and provenance diligence alongside the corporate, tax and land work described in Due diligence in Rwanda. The buyer should identify every direct and indirect shareholder, director and beneficial owner and screen them; review the target's sales to refiners and traders since at least 2024, including any dealings with the persons listed in 2025 and 2026; check the target's ICGLR certificates, traceability records and FIC reporting; and confirm that RMB's licence is in good standing. Transfers of a licence or of shares in its holder need RMB's prior written approval under Articles 16 to 18 of the Mining Law, and the gain is subject to 10% capital gains tax under Law N° 014/2025 of 27/05/2025 (Mining licences and quarry licences).
Contracts should contain sanctions warranties covering the counterparty and its owners, an undertaking to notify any designation, the right to suspend or terminate without liability if performance would breach applicable sanctions, and a payment clause avoiding channels that would involve blocked persons. Lenders will add sanctions and anti-corruption covenants, and RMB's model agreement already provides that nothing in it permits derogation from laws on anti-corruption, human rights and national security. Where a counterparty becomes listed during a contract, performance must stop to the extent the applicable regime requires, and any wind-down must rely on a licence from the sanctioning authority.
The reforms of 2024 to 2026
The legal framework for minerals has been rebuilt in two years. Law N° 056/2024 of 26/06/2024 establishing tax on minerals took effect on 5 July 2024, cutting royalties to between 0.5% and 3% and adding an export tax on raw minerals. Law N° 072/2024 on mining and quarry operations took effect on 24 July 2024, keeping the small-, medium- and large-scale mining licences and the special radioactive minerals licence of the 2018 law, adding a power to grant the Government a free carried interest (Article 49) and setting new faults and penalties. Law N° 014/2025 of 27/05/2025 raised capital gains tax to 10% and extended it to licence transfers. Ministerial Order N° 003/MoE/25 of 19/08/2025 replaced the environmental and social impact assessment rules. The anti-money-laundering framework was replaced by Law N° 001/2025 of 22/01/2025 and FIC regulations of January 2025 and June 2026.
Institutions and markets changed too. RMB launched competitive licensing rounds through its Mining Investment Pitchbook in May and December 2025, had a new chief executive from July 2025, and on 4 March 2026 the Cabinet appointed new senior managers of RMB, including a Division Manager for Mining Cadastre and Digital Information. Rwanda and the DRC signed their Peace Agreement on 27 June 2025 and the Regional Economic Integration Framework on 4 December 2025, when Rwanda also signed an economic framework with the United States, and in September 2026 the Government took a 25% stake in a tungsten venture with Almonty Industries (Strategic minerals and regional deals). Several instruments the 2024 Laws require have not yet been made, and RMB continues to apply its 2019 regulations in the meantime (The Mining Law 2024 and regulators).
The foreign measures at a glance
| Date | Authority and instrument | Persons listed relevant to the mineral sector | Effect | Who must comply |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 March 2025 | Council of the European Union; Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2025/510 implementing Decision 2010/788/CFSP | Gasabo Gold Refinery (Kigali); Francis Kamanzi, described as RMB chief executive | Asset freeze; travel ban; no funds or economic resources to be made available | EU nationals and companies, and anyone acting within the EU |
| 2 March 2026 | US Treasury, OFAC; Executive Order 13413 as amended by Executive Order 13671 (press release sb0411) | Rwanda Defence Force and four senior officers; entities owned 50% or more by them | Blocking; DRC-related General License 1 allowed wind-down until 1 April 2026 | US persons, persons in the US and US-dollar transactions clearing through the US |
| 25 June 2026 | US Treasury, OFAC; Executive Order 13413 as amended (press release sb0543) | Gasabo Gold Refinery LTD; its chairman and general manager; Bugambira Mines LTD; Wolfram Mining and Processing LTD; Rwinkwavu Mining Corporation LTD | Blocking; no general licence published with the action | As above; non-US persons face exposure for evasion or causing violations |
Rwanda's minerals reforms, July 2024 to September 2026
| Date | Change | Instrument or source |
|---|---|---|
| 5 July 2024 | Royalties cut to 0.5% to 3%; raw-export tax added | Law N° 056/2024 of 26/06/2024 |
| 24 July 2024 | New mining law in force; Law n° 58/2018 repealed | Law N° 072/2024 of 26/06/2024 |
| 22 January 2025 | New anti-money-laundering law; dealers in precious metals and stones remain reporting persons | Law N° 001/2025 of 22/01/2025 |
| 29 May 2025 | Capital gains tax of 10%, covering licence transfers | Law N° 014/2025 of 27/05/2025 |
| May and December 2025 | Competitive licensing rounds of 10 blocks each | RMB Mining Investment Pitchbook |
| 19 August 2025 | New environmental and social impact assessment rules | Ministerial Order N° 003/MoE/25 |
| 4 December 2025 | Regional Economic Integration Framework with the DRC; US-Rwanda economic framework | Signed in Washington |
| 4 March 2026 | Cabinet appoints new RMB senior managers, including a Division Manager for Mining Cadastre and Digital Information | RMB announcement of 5 March 2026 |
| 22 June 2026 | New FIC anti-money-laundering and sanctions regulations | Regulations N° 001/FIC/2026 and 002/FIC/2026 |
| 14 September 2026 | Government takes 25% of a tungsten venture | Almonty Industries announcement |
Decision guide
Can we deal with this counterparty?
A screening guide for a buyer, refiner, lender or acquirer dealing with a Rwandan mineral business. It does not replace sanctions advice in the jurisdictions that apply to you.
- Is the counterparty, or any director, shareholder or beneficial owner, on the EU consolidated list or the OFAC SDN List?YesStop. Do not make funds or goods available; consider freezing and reporting duties in your jurisdiction; take sanctions advice.NoContinue to Q2.
- Do one or more blocked persons own 50% or more of the counterparty, directly or indirectly, adding their holdings together?YesTreat the counterparty as blocked under the US rules; under EU rules assess ownership and control; stop and take advice.NoContinue to Q3.
- Have the minerals passed through, been refined by or been sold by a listed person since its listing?YesTreat as a red flag: suspend, investigate the chain of custody and take advice before proceeding.NoContinue to Q4.
- Does the counterparty hold a valid RMB licence, and do the minerals carry an export certificate and complete traceability records?YesContinue to Q5.NoDo not proceed: minerals without proof of origin are confiscated and illegally extracted minerals may not be traded under Articles 50, 64 and 65 of Law N° 072/2024.
- Will payment be made through a bank, in a traceable form, below or properly documented above the cash thresholds?YesProceed, keeping records of each check and repeating screening at each shipment.NoRestructure the payment: cash of RWF 15,000,000 or more triggers due diligence and reporting, and opaque routes undermine your sanctions defence.
Before buying, financing or acquiring
Documents and checks to complete and keep on file.
- Ownership mapA chart of every direct and indirect owner of the counterparty to the ultimate beneficial owners at 25% or more, with each screened.
- Screening recordDated results against the EU consolidated list and the OFAC SDN List for the counterparty, its owners, directors, refiners and logistics providers.
- Licence and certificateCopy of the RMB licence, checked as current, and the Mineral Export Certificate or ICGLR certificate verified through RMB's system.
- Traceability fileTag numbers, logbook entries and chain-of-custody documents from mine to export.
- OECD risk assessmentA written assessment under Step 2 of the OECD Guidance, with the response under Step 3 for any red flag.
- Payment routeBank details matching the counterparty, with no third-party or cash payments outside the FIC thresholds.
- Contract protectionsSanctions warranties, notification of designation, suspension and termination rights, and audit rights.
- Reporting calendarEU importer reports, Form SD by 31 May for US issuers, and FIC reports within two working days or 24 hours as applicable.
Worked example
Screening a tin concentrate supplier
A European smelter is offered 40 tonnes of tin concentrate by a Kigali trading company. The names and holdings are invented and the figures illustrative.
| Ownership | The trader is owned 30% by Mr A, 25% by Company B and 45% by Ms C. Company B is wholly owned by Company D. |
|---|---|
| Screening result | Mr A and Company D are on the OFAC SDN List; Ms C is not listed. |
| 50 percent test | Blocked persons' holdings: Mr A 30% directly; Company D 25% indirectly through its wholly owned Company B. Aggregate 30% + 25% = 55%, which is 50% or more, so the trader is itself blocked under the US rules although it is not named. |
| If the holdings had been 30% and 15% | Aggregate 45%: not blocked by ownership alone, but still a high-risk counterparty requiring enhanced due diligence and, for EU purposes, an assessment of control. |
| Provenance | One lot of concentrate worth RWF 120,000,000 has no proof of origin: if found in Rwanda, it is confiscated and an administrative fine of 10% x RWF 120,000,000 = RWF 12,000,000 is due (Article 50 of Law N° 072/2024). |
| Cash | The trader asks for an advance of RWF 18,000,000 in cash. That exceeds the RWF 15,000,000 threshold for dealers in precious metals and stones, triggering customer due diligence and a cash transaction report within two working days. |
| Outcome | The smelter declines the offer, records its screening and assessment, and takes advice on any reporting duty in its own jurisdiction. |
Under the 50 percent rule, holdings of different blocked persons are added together; a structure that splits ownership into minority stakes does not avoid it.
EU rules turn on ownership and control and are not identical to the US test; both must be applied where both apply.
Questions investors ask
Which Rwandan mining businesses are under sanctions?
On 25 June 2026 OFAC designated Gasabo Gold Refinery LTD and three mining companies, Bugambira Mines LTD, Wolfram Mining and Processing LTD and Rwinkwavu Mining Corporation LTD, with the refinery's chairman and general manager. The EU listed Gasabo Gold Refinery on 17 March 2025. Entities owned 50% or more by designated persons are also blocked under US rules. Always check the current lists.
Do EU and US sanctions apply inside Rwanda?
They are not Rwandan law and bind persons within EU or US jurisdiction. In practice they reach most mineral trade, because payments in US dollars clear through US banks and buyers, refiners and lenders are often European or American. Rwanda's own targeted financial sanctions regime under Law N° 001/2025 concerns terrorist and proliferation financing.
What is OFAC's 50 percent rule?
Any entity owned 50 percent or more, directly or indirectly, individually or in aggregate, by one or more blocked persons is itself blocked, even if it is not named on the SDN List. Holdings of different blocked persons are added together, so a buyer must map the full ownership chain of every counterparty.
Was the Rwanda Mines, Petroleum and Gas Board sanctioned?
No sanction against RMB as an institution has been announced. On 17 March 2025 the EU listed Francis Kamanzi, described in the Council's announcement as RMB's chief executive. RMB has had a new chief executive since July 2025, as reported in the press. Dealings with RMB as regulator are not themselves prohibited by the measures described here.
What due diligence must a buyer of Rwandan minerals carry out?
Follow the five-step OECD Due Diligence Guidance, screen every counterparty and its owners against EU and US lists, check the RMB licence, export certificate and traceability records, and keep evidence. EU importers of tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold must do so under Regulation (EU) 2017/821, and US issuers report on Form SD.
What anti-money-laundering rules apply to Rwandan mineral dealers?
Dealers in precious metals and stones are reporting persons under Article 8 of Law N° 001/2025. They must apply customer due diligence to cash transactions of RWF 15,000,000 or more, report such transactions within two working days and suspicious transactions within 24 hours, and identify beneficial owners at 25%.
Terms you will meet in the documents
| English | Kinyarwanda | French | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Targeted financial sanctions | ibihano byo mu rwego rw'imari byagenwe | sanctions financières ciblées | Asset freezes and prohibitions aimed at designated persons; in Rwandan law, those related to terrorist and proliferation financing (Article 67 of Law N° 001/2025). |
| Freezing | guhagarika | gel | Prohibiting the transfer, conversion or use of funds and assets of a designated person, required within 24 hours under Regulations N° 001/FIC/2025. |
| Customer due diligence | ubushishozi ku mukiriya | devoir de vigilance à l'égard de la clientèle | Identifying and verifying a customer and its beneficial owners before or during a transaction (Law N° 001/2025). |
| Beneficial owner | — | bénéficiaire effectif | The natural person who ultimately owns or controls an entity, identified at 25% or more of shares or voting rights. |
| Politically exposed person | umuntu ugaragara mu rwego rwa politiki | personne politiquement exposée | A person with a prominent public function, subject to enhanced due diligence (Article 22 of Law N° 001/2025). |
| Money laundering | iyezandonke | blanchiment de capitaux | Concealing or using the proceeds of crime, punished by 10 to 15 years' imprisonment (Article 56 of Law N° 001/2025). |
| Dealer in precious metals and precious stones | umucuruzi w'amabuye y'agaciro n'andi bimeze kimwe | négociant en métaux précieux et pierres précieuses | A reporting person under Article 8 of Law N° 001/2025, with a RWF 15,000,000 cash threshold. |
| Reporting persons | — | personnes déclarantes | The businesses and professions bound by anti-money-laundering duties under Article 8 of Law N° 001/2025. |
| Confiscation | ubunyagwe | confiscation | Court-ordered forfeiture of laundered assets and proceeds of crime (Article 68 of Law N° 001/2025); the Mining Law separately confiscates minerals without proof of origin. |
Related in this guide
Related investor FAQs
Official sources
- Council of the European Union: Democratic Republic of the Congo: EU lists further nine individuals and one entity (17 March 2025), Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2025/510
- US Department of the Treasury: press release sb0543 of 25 June 2026 (Gasabo Gold Refinery LTD and related persons, E.O. 13413)
- US Department of the Treasury: press release sb0411 of 2 March 2026 (Rwanda Defence Force and senior officials, E.O. 13413)
- OFAC: Recent actions of 25 June 2026 (SDN List additions, DRC programme)
- National Bank of Rwanda: Law N° 001/2025 of 22/01/2025 on the prevention and punishment of money laundering, terrorist financing and the financing of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction
- European Commission: Conflict Minerals Regulation (EU) 2017/821
Have a question about your own situation?
Ask Be Rwanda Wise's Rwandabot, the AI legal-information chatbot. It checks official Rwandan sources and points you to the governing law, or read how to find and check a Rwandan advocate.
Ask Rwandabot about thisOpen in the appFind a lawyerThis page gives legal and tax information, not legal advice. Rates, thresholds and procedures change; the content is reviewed against official sources, but you should confirm anything important with the relevant authority or an advocate registered with the Rwanda Bar Association before you act. Laws are published in Kinyarwanda, English and French in the Official Gazette; check the official text before relying on a translation.